And they keep coming: Johnson & Johnson is facing about 1,200 lawsuits implicating the company of ignoring researches that link Johnson s Baby Powder and Shower-to-Shower to ovarian cancer. You can find lender liability lgeal help here www.lenderliabilitylawyer.com.
The complainants argue in the state and federal courts that the company knew the danger, yet failed to caution its consumers.
Just this week, a U.S. jury purchased J&J to pay $55 million to South Dakota-based Gloria Ristesund, who claimed that using the talc powder for feminine hygiene led to the development of ovarian cancer. After a three-week trial, jurors chose to award Ristesund $5 million in countervailing damages in addition to $50 million in compensatory damages.
This significant J&J s 2nd loss this year, as it was also informed in the same St. Louis courthouse in February to pay $72 million to the family of 62-year-old Jackie Fox, who passed away of the exact same condition.
About 1,000 of the pending talcum-powder relevant matches are in St. Louis, while another 200 are submitted in New Jersey, according to Jim Onder, who serves as lawyer for the complainants in the two current cases. Onder said that the New-Jersey based J&J knew baby powder risks for more than 30 years.
Rather of giving a warning, what they did was targeted the groups most at threat for establishing ovarian cancer, he stated, relating to overweight women, Hispanics, and blacks.
The argument is warming up: some studies recommend that women regularly using talc confront a 40 percent higher threat of getting ovarian cancer, while J&J provides medical proof that its Johnson s Baby Powder and Shower-to-Shower are faultless.
The jury s choice, said J&J representative Carol Goodrich, contradicts 3 decades of medical researches worldwide that continue to support the safety of cosmetic talc.
The American Cancer Society identified two aspects of the concern: whether individuals exposed long-lasting to natural talc fibers have a greater lung cancer risk, or whether women applying talc in their genital location routinely have a higher ovarian cancer risk.
Talc a naturally happening drug from the soil and made up of magnesium, silicon, oxygen in addition to hydrogen is commonly used in talcum powder and other personal care products to take in moisture and enhance the cosmetic product s feel and anti-caking quality.
Carl Tobias, an expert in product-liability law, stated more losses in court will contribute to the growing wonder about of one of J&J s most famous products.
There are both financial and reputational issues that might encourage them to begin thinking about a global settlement of these cases, he stated in a Bloomberg report, suggesting the company to think about installing a settlement program to attend to the talc cases.
Thousands of women and their family members flocked to the plaintiff’s attorneys after the Fox decision came out, Jere Beasley, an attorney, stated in March. He reported that his firm, which is one of various firms representing Ristesund and the Fox household, is now examining more than 5,000 potential claims.
In 2013, the jury in a federal court in South Dakota discovered J&J irresponsible in a related case, yet did not award damages to the plaintiff. J&J is dealing with another talc case in St. Louis this September.